mastodon.design is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A small instance for and by people who make things! We stand for an open, independent, sustainable, inclusive, and accessible web.

Administered by:

Server stats:

338
active users

#fossilfuel

1 post1 participant0 posts today

Environmental groups sound new alarm as #FossilFuel lobby pushes for immunity

"Nearly 200 advocacy groups have urged Democratic representatives to “proactively and affirmatively” reject potential industry attempts to obtain immunity from litigation."

theguardian.com/us-news/2025/m

The Guardian · Environmental groups sound new alarm as fossil fuel lobby pushes for immunityBy Dharna Noor
Continued thread

Allies of the #FossilFuel industry cheered the idea that the #Trump admin would revisit the issue.

“They unfortunately didn’t do this in the 1st term, so I’m pleased to see that they’re working on this in the 2nd term,” said Tom Pyle, president of the American #Energy Alliance, an advocacy group for the #oil & #gas sector.

Myron Ebell, who led the #EPA transition team during Trump’s 1st term, said nixing the #endangerment finding could make it easier to overturn #Biden-era #climate policies.

#Indiana natural gas bill would redefine the #FossilFuel as green energy

"Sen. Jim Buck, R-Kokomo, introduced Senate Bill 178 that, if passed, will allow #NaturalGas and propane the same status as #RenewableEnergy sources when applying federal money to clean or green energy projects.

Buck said he fashioned his bill after an Ohio law [backed by ALEC] that similarly defined methane as clean energy.

Buck is on ALEC’s board of directors."

indystar.com/story/news/enviro

The Indianapolis Star · Indiana natural gas bill would redefine the fossil fuel as green energyBy , The Indianapolis Star
Replied in thread

@urlyman @Tallish_Tom Which means decarbonising mining and smelting is of the highest urgency. But at the same time we do have to stop burning #FossilFuel altogether within 25 years, and that means that those things we can't decarbonise we're just going to have to do without.

It seems to me that air travel and single use plastics are two examples of things we could very easily do without.

I'm working on yet another blog post on the future of the global energy economy, again driven by the matter of #Aviation fuel; and what my current figures are showing is that at current rates of building new energy infrastructure, we are going to have about ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY THOUSAND YEARS of relative energy poverty between 2050 and when we've built enough #ZeroCarbon energy infrastructure to replace our current #FossilFuel use.

I'm checking my numbers, but this looks bleak!

It’s time for climate populism

"Start where people are. Talk to them less about an invisible gas that needs to be eliminated by some future date, and more about high energy bills caused by volatile #FossilFuel prices we can’t control.

#Climate action can become popular when people understand its benefits in the terms of their own communities, and their own lives."

newstatesman.com/environment/2

By Caroline Lucas and Rupert Read

New Statesman · It’s time for climate populismBy Caroline Lucas

None of the current #CCS prototypes actually works and takes out more #CarbonDioxide #CO2 than it uses in #emissions to remove it. That's the problem. Which is why it is counter-productive now, and even if it does improve, in future will be a very expensive way to reduce emissions. But lots of big #FossilFuel companies get massive #subsidies from us tax payers to do it.

£22bn for 'unproven' green tech could raise bills, MPs warn

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce8jpj

BBC NewsBillions risked on 'unproven' green tech, MPs warnThe Public Accounts Committee warns the government of gambling public money on carbon capture.
Continued thread

Finally, an answer to why Earth’s oceans have been on a record hot streak
A new study finds that the rate of ocean warming has more than quadrupled over the past 40 years — and pinpoints why.

by Sachi Kitajima Mulkey, January 28, 2025

"By looking back through satellite observations since 1985 and developing a statistical model that isolated the trends in both ocean warming and Earth’s energy imbalance, the researchers found they were escalating in lockstep. According to Merchant, the study is possibly the first to connect the two phenomena over recent decades. 'It’s a very tight correlation,' [Christopher Merchant, climate scientist] said.

"This relationship is bad news for the oceans, which have absorbed some 90 percent of the excess warming from human activity. Some of that heat will continue to seep down into the planet’s depths, while some will cycle back up toward the surface and escape into the atmosphere. According to the study, the next 20 years could warm up the oceans more than the last 40.

"If you think of the oceans as a bath, Merchant says, it’s like the hot tap was only a trickle in the 1980s — but now, it’s been cranked up. 'And what’s turning the tap more open, making the warming pick up speed, is an increase in#GreenhouseGases — #CarbonDioxide and #methane — which are both still rising, largely from the #FossilFuel industry,' he said.

"There are other factors turning up the heat. The El Niño pattern that began in 2023 added around 0.1 or 0.2 degrees Celsius, before the inverse La Niña pattern took over in December 2024.

"Another piece of the puzzle is the planet’s diminishing reflectivity, according to Brian McNoldy, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Miami’s Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science. The ocean’s dark surface helps it absorb heat, whereas white clouds and aerosol particles in the atmosphere help bounce the sun’s radiation back into space. In 2020, the International Maritime Organization adopted a new rule to cut back on sulfur pollution from shipping fuel, but because the aerosol particles in emissions acted as a seed for clouds, the regulation had the unintended effect of dimming the marine layer of clouds that blanket the ocean.

"'So you get rid of a lot of those, and now more of the sun’s energy can be absorbed in the ocean instead of reflecting off clouds,' McNoldy said. According to Merchant, efforts to curb air pollution from factories in countries like China also had the side effect of cutting back reflective aerosols.

"The excess ocean warmth has had wide-ranging consequences. In April 2024, as the oceans started simmering, 77 percent of the world’s coral reefs became imperiled in the most extensive bleaching event on record, threatening the livelihoods of a billion people and a quarter of marine life. Changing ocean temperatures also shift weather patterns, potentially intensifying droughts, downpours, and storms alike.

"'Hurricanes love warmer water. So all other things be equal, a warmer ocean can produce stronger hurricanes with maybe more frequent instances of rapid intensification,' McNoldy said. Last September, Hurricane Helene slammed into Florida’s Gulf Coast after surging from a Category 1 to a Category 4 storm in a single day.

"'The oceans really set the pace for global warming for the Earth as a whole,' Merchant said. The knock-on effects — like wildfires, drought, and floods — will continue to escalate, too. 'That really needs to be understood, but it also needs to filter through to governments that changes might be coming down the line faster than they’re currently assuming.”"

Read more:
grist.org/oceans/why-earth-oce
#ClimateCrisis #OceanWarming #BigOilAndGas #ClimateCatastrophe

Grist · Finally, an answer to why Earth’s oceans have been on a record hot streakBy Sachi Kitajima Mulkey